Experts in healthcare reimbursement and regulation,
providing customized consulting
and education services.

Training Programs

We bring the experts to you with a range of on-site education options and bootcamp style programs that teach how a firm grasp of the rules leads to operational excellence.

More information »

Audits & Assessments

Our team of specialized regulatory specialists can assist your organization in revving up your revenue cycle by auditing and assessing key processes for coding and billing.

More information »

Regulatory Monitoring

Our team is available for ongoing regulatory watchdog services that answer your questions and offer you the latest Medicare news, analysis and operational guidance.

More information »

Archive for audit

Nov
17

Refresh your knowledge of core concepts for coding accuracy

Posted by: HIM Connection | Comments (0)
Email This Post Print This Post
Clinical knowledge is an essential element for capturing severity and MS-DRG assignment, according to Gloryanne Bryant, RHIA, CCS, CCDS, regional managing director of HIM at Kaiser Permanente in Oakland, CA. “When we’re talking about DRG changes and coding changes, it’s important to enhance clinical knowledge,” she said.
 
Additionally, refresh your knowledge of the following core concepts for coding accuracy:
  • Case-mix index. Track this monthly and look for changes. What is your highest-volume DRG, primary diagnosis, and secondary diagnosis?
  • Accurate and complete coding. Know the Uniform Hospital Discharge Data Set definition of principal diagnosis: “that condition established after study to be chiefly responsible for occasioning the admission of the patient to the hospital for care.”
  • Physician documentation. This is key to accurate code assignment. Have your clinical documentation improvement specialist determine where improvements are needed.
  • Coding audits. Perform audits regularly to evaluate accuracy and potential over- or undercoding.
“These are great actions to take to ensure accuracy in documentation, case-mix index, and certainly your MS-DRGs,” Bryant said.
 
Editor’s note: This tip is adapted from the November 2009 issue of Briefings on Coding Compliance Strategies.
Comments (0)
Nov
12

Providers report first RAC denials in Florida, South Carolina

Posted by: Andrea Kraynak, CPC-A | Comments (0)
Email This Post Print This Post

Healthcare providers in several states received their first RAC denials.

Connolly Healthcare, the Region C RAC for Florida, South Carolina and several other states, has been behind many of them.

One hospital in South Carolina reports having three claims denied. However, learning of those denials did not go smoothly. The hospital received a call in late October from Connolly regarding a denial letter the hospital never received. The RAC sent the original denial letter in early August, and although it was addressed to the hospital, it apparently had no specific contact person listed, and the hospital never received it. Read More→

Comments (0)
Nov
12

Could RAC mass adjustment changes mean increase in automatic audits?

Posted by: The RAC Report | Comments (2)
Email This Post Print This Post
Providers who believe their RAC denials will be limited to 200 every 45 days (corresponding with the medical record request limits) may be in for a surprise. Those limits apply only to complex audits, but no such limits exist for the number of automatic reviews RACs can perform.
 
“RACs can do as many [automated reviews] as they want. I think it is in people’s heads that they can look at only 200 at any one time, but that’s really not true,” says Kimberly Anderwood Hoy, JD, CPC, director of Medicare and compliance for HCPro, Inc.
 
In fact, recent changes to the RAC process for handling mass quantities of recoupments from automatic reviews may even make it easier for RACs to increase their auditing capabilities—meaning the potential for even more denials for providers. Read More→
Comments (2)
Nov
03

Have you been audited by a RAC?

Posted by: Andrea Kraynak, CPC-A | Comments (0)
Email This Post Print This Post

If you’ve been audited by a RAC–for example, perhaps you’ve received a demand letter in the mail indicating a RAC has denied one of your claims–we want to hear from you.

The first three providers to share their stories will receive a free audio conference from HCPro. E-mail editor Andrea Kraynak (akraynak@hcpro.com) if you have a story to share.

Comments (0)
Oct
15

AHA RAC Program Update answers provider questions

Posted by: Andrea Kraynak, CPC-A | Comments (0)
Email This Post Print This Post

As of September 18, all four RACs were conducting automated audits, according to an October 6 American Hospital Association (AHA) RAC program update. But only 16 of the 23 audits underway were on hospital outpatient claims, according to the AHA. (The others were therefore on physician and durable medical equipment claims.)

So unless your hospital is so very unlucky to have been selected as one of the first for an audit, chances are you still have time to make a few necessary tweaks and run a few tests on your RAC processes to help ensure you’re ready when RACs do begin auditing your facility.

Read More→

Sep
22

CMS clarifies RACs’ ‘exception authority’

Posted by: Medicare Weekly Update | Comments (0)
Email This Post Print This Post

By Debbie Mackaman, RHIA, CHCO, regulatory specialist for HCPro, Inc.

On September 11, CMS published Transmittal 302 that updated the Program Integrity Manual on Local Coverage Determination (LCD) exceptions. When specific authorized contractors conduct a complex medical review, they have the authority (in rare and unusual circumstances) to apply an exception to the “reasonable and necessary” requirements described in an LCD to approve or deny a claim.  However, they cannot make exceptions to National Coverage Determinations (NCDs). In addition, and unless otherwise directed by CMS, RACs can only use the exceptions process to not deny a claim.  This is a good time to review the difference between a national and a local coverage determination policy.

Click over to the MedicareMentor Blog to read more.


Sep
10

RAC issues approved for North Carolina

Posted by: Andrea Kraynak, CPC-A | Comments (0)
Email This Post Print This Post

Connolly, the RAC for Region C, approved several issues for North Carolina providers on September 10.

The following issues have been approved for outpatient hospitals and physicians in North Carolina:

  • Untimed codes
  • Once in a lifetime procedures
  • Pediatric codes exceeding age parameters
  • J2505: Injection, Pegfilgrastim, 6 mg

Connolly may also audit Durable Medical Equipment (DME) providers in North Carolina for Wheelchair bundling and Urological bundling.

Sep
09

Tip: Support your audit findings

Posted by: Compliance Monitor | Comments (0)
Email This Post Print This Post

The Office of Inspector General (OIG) will be searching for relevant information prudent to your hospital’s audit. This information is called evidence. To support your audit begin to collect four types of evidence before the OIG visits:

  • Physical Evidence: Paraphernalia obtained through direct inspection of property, events, and people. (e.g., maps, photographs, illustrations, written summaries of observations, charts)
  • Documentary Evidence: Created evidence including: spreadsheets, accounting records, contracts, invoices, letters, performance reports, and surveys.
  • Testimonial Evidence: Information received through bias-free interviews and inquiries from individuals involved in the particular audit.
  • Analytical Evidence: Collect analytical evidence through the verification of amassed information, facts, and data. Laws, legal and non-legal opinions, hospital standards, and past and present operations should all be compared to your analytical findings.

This week’s tip was adapted from The Healthcare Auditor’s Handbook, for more information about the book or to order your copy click here.