Experts in healthcare reimbursement and regulation,
providing customized consulting
and education services.

Training Programs

We bring the experts to you with a range of on-site education options and bootcamp style programs that teach how a firm grasp of the rules leads to operational excellence.

More information »

Audits & Assessments

Our team of specialized regulatory specialists can assist your organization in revving up your revenue cycle by auditing and assessing key processes for coding and billing.

More information »

Regulatory Monitoring

Our team is available for ongoing regulatory watchdog services that answer your questions and offer you the latest Medicare news, analysis and operational guidance.

More information »

Archive for Billing and reimbursement

Nov
03

CMS issues 2010 final rule for ambulatory surgery centers and most hospital outpatient departments

Posted by: Medicare Weekly Update | Comments (0)
Email This Post Print This Post

By Judith Kares, JD, CPC, regulatory specialist for HCPro, Inc., is the author of this week’s note from the instructor.

CMS has released a display copy of the outpatient prospective payment system (OPPS) final rule for 2010, which also includes the 2010 changes to the rules for ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs).  This final rule will be published in the Federal Register on November 20.  In terms of reimbursement, OPPS hospitals that meet quality indicator reporting requirements for 2010 are entitled to the “full update,” which will result in a 2.1% increase in their payments for 2010.  Those OPPS hospitals that do not meet their quality indicator reporting requirements will be subject to a reduced update of 0.1% in 2010.  ASCs, on the other hand, will receive a 1.2% inflation update beginning January 1, 2010.

Among the most anticipated changes in the OPPS final rule are the so-called “incident to” a physician’s services requirements.  Most nonphysician outpatient therapeutic services that are provided by hospitals or critical access hospitals (CAHs) are only covered if they are provided “incident to” the services of a physician or another specified nonphysician practitioner.

Click over to the MedicareMentor Blog to read more.


Oct
15

AHA RAC Program Update answers provider questions

Posted by: Andrea Kraynak, CPC-A | Comments (0)
Email This Post Print This Post

As of September 18, all four RACs were conducting automated audits, according to an October 6 American Hospital Association (AHA) RAC program update. But only 16 of the 23 audits underway were on hospital outpatient claims, according to the AHA. (The others were therefore on physician and durable medical equipment claims.)

So unless your hospital is so very unlucky to have been selected as one of the first for an audit, chances are you still have time to make a few necessary tweaks and run a few tests on your RAC processes to help ensure you’re ready when RACs do begin auditing your facility.

Read More→

Oct
15

OIG plans to review Medicare, Medicaid auditing programs

Posted by: Andrea Kraynak, CPC-A | Comments (0)
Email This Post Print This Post

Healthcare providers are finding themselves and their reimbursement claims accountable to more and more auditors as CMS steps up its Medicare and Medicaid auditing activities. And CMS is unlikely to decrease auditing for incorrectly paid claims anytime soon; it too is being held accountable—by the Office of Inspector General (OIG).

In 2010, the OIG plans to review the progress of many Medicare and Medicaid auditing programs, as well as CMS’ oversight of several of the programs, according to the 2010 Work Plan, released October 1. Read More→

Oct
06

September 28-October 5 Issuances: OIG issues 2010 Work Plan, CMS updates lab NCDs and RAC FAQ

Posted by: Medicare Weekly Update | Comments (0)
Email This Post Print This Post

OIG issues Work Plan

On October 1, the OIG issued its Work Plan for FY 2010.

View the Work Plan.

Read More→

Oct
02

Five Last-Minute Tips to Prepare for RACs

Posted by: Andrea Kraynak, CPC-A | Comments (0)
Email This Post Print This Post

RACs have begun auditing at this point, and providers in some states may have received their first denial letters this week. But many providers seem to still be waiting, holding their breath, and worrying whether the mail carrier might deliver their first RAC demand letter(s) that day.

However tempting it may be to simply wait, providers can still use this time effectively. Consider the following tips from several RAC experts: Read More→

Sep
30

Q&A: Charging for behavioral therapy in the home setting

Posted by: JustCoding News | Comments (0)
Email This Post Print This Post

Q: I have a question regarding behavioral health treatment sessions. Can a physician or licensed therapist (e.g., LPC or LCSW) provide therapy to a client at the client’s home and then charge this service to the insurance company?

Read More→

Comments (0)
Sep
29

Accurately assign POA indicators with the right info

Posted by: HIM Connection | Comments (0)
Email This Post Print This Post

The present-on-admission (POA) indicator refers to conditions that are present at the time an order for inpatient admission occurs. Coders should report a POA indicator for a principal diagnosis, as well as any secondary diagnoses or E codes.

To assign POA, coders must rely on a treating physician’s documentation. Assuming physician documentation is accurate and complete, a coder can consider these tips when assigning a POA indicator: Read More→

Comments (0)
Sep
29

Q&A: Coding conditions as “acute” versus “chronic”

Posted by: HIM Connection | Comments (0)
Email This Post Print This Post

Q: A patient came into the ER with complaints of a headache and facial pain. The ER physician gave a final diagnosis of sinusitis. This patient had no history of sinusitis. After a coding review, the reviewer said we were wrong to use “acute” and told us to use “chronic.” She told us never to use “acute” unless the physician documents the condition as “acute.” We were previously under the impression that when coding ER accounts, coders should always report conditions as “acute.” Do you know of any ER coding guidelines or publications that would clear this up?

Read More→

Comments (0)