Experts in healthcare reimbursement and regulation,
providing customized consulting
and education services.

Training Programs

We bring the experts to you with a range of on-site education options and bootcamp style programs that teach how a firm grasp of the rules leads to operational excellence.

More information »

Audits & Assessments

Our team of specialized regulatory specialists can assist your organization in revving up your revenue cycle by auditing and assessing key processes for coding and billing.

More information »

Regulatory Monitoring

Our team is available for ongoing regulatory watchdog services that answer your questions and offer you the latest Medicare news, analysis and operational guidance.

More information »

Archive for Billing and reimbursement

Sep
29

September 21-28 Transmittals and MLN Matters articles: CMS updates drug HCPCS hook and hold, rescinds/replaces transmittals, and more

Posted by: Medicare Weekly Update | Comments (0)
Email This Post Print This Post

CMS rescinds, replaces LCD exception transmittal

On September 25, CMS replaced its previous transmittal on LCD exceptions. It had previously sent out the incorrect version of section 3.12. All other material remains the same.

Effective date: October 13, 2009
Implementation date: October 13, 2009

Read More→

Sep
29

Condition Code 44 – The Next Chapter

Posted by: Medicare Weekly Update | Comments (0)
Email This Post Print This Post

Editor’s note: Debbie Mackaman, RHIA, CHCO, regulatory specialist for HCPro, Inc., is the author of this week’s note from the instructor.

After CMS issued Transmittal 1803, we have continued to receive questions on the correct way to bill for outpatient services when Condition Code 44 criteria have been met. The next chapter of the story involves determining if and when observation begins.

Click over to the MedicareMentor Blog to read more.


Sep
23

Find a physician advisor in your organization

Posted by: Case Management Weekly | Comments (0)
Email This Post Print This Post
If your facility has identified the need for a physician advisor (PA), a great place to begin searching for the ideal candidate is within your organization.
 
Hiring a physician who has been on the medical staff for at least three to five years may be beneficial. These individuals already know the hospital system, physicians, policies, and politics.
 
Determine which active medical staff members are very knowledgeable with respect to medical necessity and length of stay (LOS) issues, practice high-quality evidence-based medicine, communicate effectively, and use hospital resources responsibly. Then observe them during committee and department meetings to assess how they relate to their peers. Once you identify individuals who meet these qualifications, approaching them to inquire whether they have interest in working as a PA might be worthwhile.
 
This tip was adapted from the HCPro book, Optimizing the Physician Advisor in Case Management. To learn more about this book or order your copy, click here.
Comments (0)
Sep
22

September 14-21 Transmittals and MLN Matters articles: CMS rescinds/replaces transmittals, issues special edition MLN Matters

Posted by: Medicare Weekly Update | Comments (0)
Email This Post Print This Post

CMS replaces FDG PET transmittals

On September 18, CMS rescinded and replaced two previous transmittals related to FDG PET coverage.

Effective date: April 6, 2009
Implementation date: October 19, 2009

Read More→

Sep
22

CMS clarifies RACs’ ‘exception authority’

Posted by: Medicare Weekly Update | Comments (0)
Email This Post Print This Post

By Debbie Mackaman, RHIA, CHCO, regulatory specialist for HCPro, Inc.

On September 11, CMS published Transmittal 302 that updated the Program Integrity Manual on Local Coverage Determination (LCD) exceptions. When specific authorized contractors conduct a complex medical review, they have the authority (in rare and unusual circumstances) to apply an exception to the “reasonable and necessary” requirements described in an LCD to approve or deny a claim.  However, they cannot make exceptions to National Coverage Determinations (NCDs). In addition, and unless otherwise directed by CMS, RACs can only use the exceptions process to not deny a claim.  This is a good time to review the difference between a national and a local coverage determination policy.

Click over to the MedicareMentor Blog to read more.


Sep
21

Last RAC announces first issues–DCS posts approved issues for Region A

Posted by: Andrea Kraynak, CPC-A | Comments (0)
Email This Post Print This Post

DCS Healthcare has released its first CMS-approved issues for audits in Region A.

The three issues, including one new issue not yet approved in other RAC regions, are applicable to durable medical equipment (DME) suppliers in Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Vermont.

According to the DCS Web site, the issues include the following: Read More→

Sep
16

Inpatient HINNs – Protecting the hospital’s right to recover payment for non-covered services

Posted by: Medicare Weekly Update | Comments (0)
Email This Post Print This Post

By Judith Kares, JD, CPC, regulatory specialist for HCPro, Inc.

Last month, I participated in an HCPro audioconference on HINNs. "HINN" stands for hospital-issued notice of non-coverage. It’s the inpatient equivalent of an advanced beneficiary notice (ABN).

Under Medicare’s limitation on liability (LOL) provisions, hospitals are required to provide prior notice, in a prescribed form, when certain outpatient or inpatient services ordered by a physician do not meet Medicare’s medical necessity guidelines for the patient’s condition.

In such cases, the ABN is the prescribed form of prior notice for outpatient services, while the HINN is the prescribed from of prior notice for inpatient services. Although the prior notice requirements for LOL have been in place for a number of years, hospitals continue to struggle to provide timely, appropriate notification, particularly in the inpatient setting.

Click over to the MedicareMentor Blog to read more.

Sep
15

Q&A: Coding acute blood loss anemia due to patient noncompliance

Posted by: HIM Connection | Comments (0)
Email This Post Print This Post

Q: A patient undergoes outpatient surgery and is subsequently admitted due to acute blood loss anemia with hemorrhage and low hematocrit and hemoglobin caused by Plavix®. A physician had instructed the patient to discontinue this medication 10 days before surgery. However, the patient admits after surgery that he or she stopped taking the drug only two days before surgery.

What ICD-9 code(s) should I report for this scenario? Read More→

Comments (0)