Training Programs
Audits & Assessments
Regulatory MonitoringCondition code 44 – The continuing saga
By Judith Kares, an regulatory specialist for HCPro, Inc.
On August 28, CMS issued Medicare Claims Processing Manual (MCPM) transmittal 1803, which is the October 2009 update to the Outpatient Prospective Payment System (OPPS). CMS included minor revisions to those sections of Chapter 1 of the MCPM that relate to condition code 44.
As you will recall, condition code 44 is used when a patient’s initial inpatient status is successfully changed to outpatient for purposes of billing and payment. This generally occurs when case management and other utilization review personnel were not available (weekends and holidays) at the time that the admission decision was made, and it is later determined that the patient does not meet Medicare’s inpatient guidelines. Condition code 44 is reported on the subsequent outpatient (013X) type of bill that is submitted to recover the services provided in the inpatient setting.
Those inpatient services are covered and reimbursed on the same terms and conditions as if they actually had been provided in the outpatient setting, as long as all of the following criteria are met:
- The decision to change status must be made by the hospital’s “utilization review committee” (UR committee). One “member” of the UR committee can make the decision, with the attending physician’s agreement; in all other cases, the decision must be made by at least two “members.” The change in status must be made prior to discharge or release of the patient and before the hospital has submitted a claim for the inpatient admission;
- A physician must concur with the decision;
- The physician’s concurrence must be documented in the patient’s medical record; and
- The UR committee must provide written notice to the hospital, the patient, and the patient’s physician within two days (but not later than the patient’s discharge or release from the hospital) of the change and its impact on the patient, including financial liability for applicable deductible and coinsurance amounts.
In the transmittal issued on August 28, CMS stated that although one physician member of the UR committee is empowered to make the decision to change status, the physician member who makes the decision must be different from the concurring physician, who is the physician responsible for the care of the patient. Based upon this most recent statement, it is not clear what the effect would be if the physician responsible for the care of the patient did not concur with the change in status.
Read the rest of this post, or share your thoughts on this topic.
Browse more blog posts at www.casemanagementmentor.com.
Get blog updates in your e-mail
Subscribe to our free RAC Report e-zine
