Experts in healthcare reimbursement and regulation,
providing customized consulting
and education services.

Training Programs

We bring the experts to you with a range of on-site education options and bootcamp style programs that teach how a firm grasp of the rules leads to operational excellence.

More information »

Audits & Assessments

Our team of specialized regulatory specialists can assist your organization in revving up your revenue cycle by auditing and assessing key processes for coding and billing.

More information »

Regulatory Monitoring

Our team is available for ongoing regulatory watchdog services that answer your questions and offer you the latest Medicare news, analysis and operational guidance.

More information »

Archive for August, 2008

Aug
19

RAC FACTS: Things you need to know

Posted by: The RAC Report | Comments (0)
Email This Post Print This Post

Editor’s note: The following are some numbers, facts and other important information about Medicare’s Recovery Audit Contractor (RAC) program:

Show the government the money: The RACs corrected more than $1 billion of Medicare improper payments from 2005 through March 27, 2008. Roughly 96% of the improper payments ($992.7 million) were overpayments collected from providers, while the remaining 4% ($37.8 million) were underpayments repaid to providers.

Inpatient is No. 1: Of the overpayments, 85% were collected from inpatient hospital providers, 6% from inpatient rehabilitation facilities, and 4% from outpatient hospital providers.

No contest: Providers chose to appeal only 14% of the RAC decisions. Of all the RAC overpayment determinations, only 4.6% were overturned on appeal. However, a memo from the California Hospital Association obtained by HCPro, Inc. says "the appeals data is incomplete, and significantly understates the volume and impact of provider appeal activity. The current report does not include appeals at the first level of appeal or other appeals in process with providers."

MSP flaws: $12.7 million was returned to the government through overpayments on Medicare Secondary Payer (MSP) RACs.

Appeal payback: Under the demonstration project, the RAC only needed to pay back the contingency fee if the claim was overturned at the first level. However, under the permanent RAC, the payback of the contingency fee would be at all levels.

Helpful Web sites: http://www.cms.hhs.gov/RAC; and www.aha.org/aha/issues/RAC

Sources: William Malm, ND, RN, president of Health Revenue Integrity Services, Inc.; CMS

Categories : e-Newsletters
Comments (0)
Aug
19

RAC REVIEW: GAO plans a review of RAC program

Posted by: The RAC Report | Comments (0)
Email This Post Print This Post

The Government Accountability Office plans to begin a review of the Medicare RAC program near the end of this year, a spokesman for the department says.

John D. Dingell, D-MI, chairman of the Committee on Energy and Commerce, wrote a letter to the Government Accountability Office July 11 requesting it review the RAC program because of “numerous reports of problems with the implementation of the program.”

Laura A. Kopelson, GAO public affairs officer, said the GAO has accepted the request and plans to begin work on it in about four months. "At this time, there is no specified completion date," she writes in an e-mail to HCPro.

Earlier this year, CMS touted its RAC demonstration project for collecting more than $1.03 billion in Medicare improper payments – $980 million in claim RACs, and $12.7 million in Medicare Secondary Payer (MSP) RACs.

But it is not a perfect system, members of Congress say. Dingell’s letter cited the following problems:

• IRFs complaints. Inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) in California reported “inconsistent communication, the use of unqualified personnel by the contractor, and review practices inconsistent with Medicare policies.”

• Contingency fee abuse. The demonstration project allowed the RAC to keep its contingency fee so long as it survived the first level of appeal. It did not matter what happened at the ensuing levels.

• Wrong overturns. CMS contracted AdvanceMed to review findings in the pilot states. It found 40 percent of the denied IRF claims were wrong.

CMS did make corrections based on these findings. It stopped reviews of California IRFs; returned the contingency fee if the RAC finding was overturned at any level; ensured incentives are equal to collect overpayments and underpayments; and improved communication.

However, Congress still wants a review, according to Dingell’s letter, which was endorsed by four other members of Congress.

To read the letter in its entirety, click here.

Categories : e-Newsletters
Comments (0)
Aug
15

Question: What services are included in CPT code 99291 (critical care, first 30-74 minutes) and should therefore not be billed separately?

Email This Post Print This Post
Question: What services are included in CPT code 99291 (critical care, first 30-74 minutes) and should therefore not be billed separately?
 
Answer: Hospitals must follow the CPT instructions related to CPT code 99291. Any services that CPT indicates are included in the reporting of CPT code 99291 should not be billed separately by the hospital.
 
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
Aug
13

NEWS: Urgent-care clinics offer ED alternative

Posted by: Patient Access Weekly Advisor | Comments (0)
Email This Post Print This Post
Walk-in urgent-care clinics are seeing a growing number of patients in need of emergency care, the Wall Street Journal reports.
 
With increasingly crowded emergency departments and a shortage of primary-care physicians, urgent-care clinics are drawing in more patients, offering shortened wait times and lower fees.
 
Insured patients might pay as little as half the amount of a typical ER visit. Some facilities provide payment plans and discounts.
 
To read the full story in the Wall Street Journal, click here.
Categories : ED, e-Newsletters
Comments (0)
Aug
13

ADVISOR’S TIP: Map out co-pay collection process

Posted by: Patient Access Weekly Advisor | Comments (0)
Email This Post Print This Post

 

Collecting that co-payment at the front lines can be a challenge for both staff members and patients.  Debra Keller, admissions/registration director for the Grand Itasca Clinic and Hospital in Grand Rapids, MN, and advisory board member for the Patient Access Resource Center, offers the following tips:

  • Use scripting as a vital tool toward getting that initial step started.
  • Have signage so patients are aware that co-pays will be collected at the time of registration.
  • During scheduling, tell patients that if they have their co-pay ready when they check in, their registration time will be shorter. When scheduling, tell patients for their convenience and to speed their registration process that they please have their co-pay ready when they check in.
  • Have your staff members keep a co-pay spreadsheet at their desk where they can note the amounts they collect and amounts they do not collect.
  • Have staff members turn in their spreadsheets to you at the end of each week. Tally their efforts and share the report with the whole group. Seeing their efforts both individually and as a whole will give them the incentive to see the collection column grow and non-collection column decrease. You may want to set a target goal for co-pays collected and offer an incentive.
Comments (0)
Aug
13

Tip: How to avoid EMTALA violations

Posted by: Compliance Monitor | Comments (0)
Email This Post Print This Post
Enforcement of The Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act of 1986 (EMTALA) is often swift and severe when facilities do not comply with its requirements. The three keys to compliance are
  • Consistency in the application of the facility standards as they relate to individuals presenting to the facility for treatment
  • Initiation and utilization of a compliant system regarding any potential violations of EMTALA
  • Most important, knowledge of the EMTALA requirements and training of staff to enable compliance in this complex area
Knowledge of EMTALA requirements is a powerful tool that, if used properly, can provide protection for both the facility providing emergency care to the public and the individual who seeks that care.

This tip was adapted from A Practical Guide to EMTALA Compliance

Categories : ED, e-Newsletters
Comments (0)
Aug
13

BlueCross BlueShield pays $2.1 M to settle false claims allegations

Posted by: Compliance Monitor | Comments (0)
Email This Post Print This Post
BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee (BCBS-T) agreed to pay $2.1 million to settle allegations that it violated the False Claims Act.
 
According to the Department of Justice (DOJ) release, Riverbend Government Benefit Administrators, a BCBS-T subsidiary that provides Medicare payment services for health care providers in 47 states, failed to adjust the cost-to-charge ratios for many New Jersey hospitals in a timely manner between 2000 and 2002. Failing to do so, resulted in the payment of excessive ”outlier payments” by Medicare to those medical facilities.
 
To read the DOJ press release click here
Comments (0)
Aug
13

California hospitals pay homeless for participation in Medicare fraud scheme, DOJ says

Posted by: Compliance Monitor | Comments (0)
Email This Post Print This Post
Federal agents arrested Rudra Sabaratnam, CEO of Los Angeles’s City of Angels hospital,  and Estill Mitts, the operator of a Skid Row health assessment center, for an alleged Medicare and Medi-Cal fraud scheme.
 
According to the Department of Justice (DOJ) release, Mitts recruited homeless people with a promise of payment and then referred them to hospitals in the area, including City of Angels. The hospitals would use the homeless people’s names to bill Medicare and Medi-Cal for procedures that were not medically necessary.
 
Both men are charged with conspiring to receive and pay kickbacks for patient referrals and to commit healthcare fraud. Sabaratnam was indicted on eight counts of paying kickbacks for patient referrals. Mitts was charged with four counts of receiving kickbacks for patient referrals.
 
Sabaratnam faces a maximum penalty of 50 years in federal prison if convicted on all charges. Mitts, who is also charged with six counts of money laundering and two counts of tax evasion, faces a maximum possible sentence of 140 years in prison.
 
The DOJ said it has also filed civil lawsuits against three other LA area hospitals that were involved in similar schemes.
 
To read the DOJ release click here
Comments (0)