September 22, 2009 | Debbie Mackaman | Comments 1
Email This Post Print This Post

CMS clarifies RACs’ “exception authority”

On September 11, CMS published Transmittal 302 that updated the Program Integrity Manual on Local Coverage Determination (LCD) exceptions. When specific authorized contractors conduct a complex medical review, they have the authority (in rare and unusual circumstances) to apply an exception to the “reasonable and necessary” requirements described in an LCD to approve or deny a claim.  However, they cannot make exceptions to National Coverage Determinations (NCDs). In addition, and unless otherwise directed by CMS, RACs can only use the exceptions process to not deny a claim.  This is a good time to review the difference between a national and a local coverage determination policy.

NCDs are coverage policies created by CMS for an item or service to be applied on a national basis for all Medicare beneficiaries. NCDs help ensure that access to advances in technologies that may improve healthcare are available to Medicare beneficiaries when those items and services are “reasonable and necessary for the diagnosis or treatment of illness or injury or to improve the functioning of a malformed body member”. However, NCDs may also be used to bar payment for specific items or services that are not “reasonable and necessary”.

LCDs are determinations made by a fiscal intermediary, carrier, or Medicare Administrative Contractor (MAC) in regards to whether or not a particular item or service is covered on an intermediary-, carrier-, or MAC-wide basis. LCDs specify the circumstances under which a service is generally considered to be “reasonable and necessary” to assist providers in submitting correct claims for payment. Medicare contractors develop LCDs when there is no NCD or when there is a need to further define an NCD. The contractors must make sure that all LCDs are consistent with all statutes, rulings, regulations, and national coverage, payment, and coding policies. In addition, codes describing what is covered and what is not covered can be part of the LCD; however, coding guidelines are not elements of LCDs.

It will be important for providers to understand where to locate and how to use an NCD and/or LCD during the RAC review and appeal processes. More information on draft, current and retired NCDs can be found in the MedicareFind database or on the CMS web site. CMS requires all draft, final (active), and retired LCD information to be posted to each contractor’s website.

Entry Information

Filed Under: CoverageRACs

Tags:

Debbie Mackaman About the Author:

Debbie is an instructor for HCPro’s Medicare Boot Camp®—Hospital Version. She has over 18 years of experience in the healthcare industry, including both inpatient and outpatient Prospective Payment Systems (IPPS, OPPS) and Critical Access Hospital (CAH) coding and reimbursement issues. She most recently held the position of the Compliance Officer and Director of Health Information Services for a healthcare system.

She consults with hospitals, physicians and other healthcare providers on a wide range of coding and billing issues. She assists in the development of compliance programs, with a focus on high risk areas including RAC topics, documentation improvement, coding and billing audits, and chargemaster maintenance.

She is an active participant with state and national organizations and task forces on coding and payment policies, privacy and continuing education. She is accredited as a Registered Health Information Administrator (RHIA) and a Certified Healthcare Compliance Officer (CHCO). She is a member of the American Health Information Management Association (AHIMA) and is the past president of the Montana Health Information Management Association (MHIMA).

RSSComments: 1  |  Post a Comment  |  Trackback URL

  1. Can anyone site a circumstance under which a RAC would apply an exception?

RSSPost a Comment  |  Trackback URL