June 29, 2009 | Judith Kares | Comments 1
Email This Post Print This Post

Inpatient Part B benefit – limited services payable under Part B to hospital inpatients

Although there were several transmittals and other CMS issuances published during the past week, they were primarily technical in nature rather than of general interest.  Having just completed a Medicare Boot Camp (Hospital Version) course in Chicago, I was reminded of a topic that I have wanted to discuss for some time.   Although not new–that is, there have been no recent changes—there are several things that participants seem surprised about when we discuss them in class.  Under the limited inpatient Part B benefit, hospitals can bill Medicare for certain nonphysician services furnished by a hospital (directly or under arrangements) to an inpatient of the hospital when these services are not covered under Part A.

Click here to comment on this post.

In PPS hospitals, Medicare will pay for these limited inpatient services under Part B when any of the following apply:

  • The patient has exhausted his Part A benefit days prior to that admission.
  • That entire admission was disapproved as not reasonable and necessary;
  • During an otherwise covered Part A stay, the days on which these services were furnished were disapproved as not reasonable and necessary;
  • The patient was not otherwise eligible for, or entitled to, coverage under Part A.

The services that are included in the inpatient Part B benefit include the following:

  • Diagnostic tests;
  • Surgical dressings, and splints, casts and other devices for fractures;
  • Prosthetic and orthotic devices;
  • Outpatient therapy services;
  • Certain screening and other preventive services otherwise covered under Part B;
  • Ambulance services; and
  • Certain drugs otherwise covered under Part B (e.g., blood clotting factors for hemophilia).  (See Medicare Benefit Policy Manual, Chapter 6, Section 10 for more details.)

Most of these services would be included in the patient’s coverage under Part A, if provided during an otherwise Part A covered stay.  The screening and other preventive services, however, are not covered under Part A, and the cost of those services is not included in the applicable DRG payment.  Therefore, even if provided during an otherwise Part A covered stay, the hospital must bill for the screening and other preventive services on a separate inpatient Part B (012X) claim.  Many hospitals have been unaware of this, and have not submitted a separate claim for these services.

The second thing that hospitals are often surprised about is that Medicare does not pay under the limited inpatient Part B benefit for some of the more expensive surgical and other procedures that would otherwise be covered under Part B if provided in the outpatient setting.

Finally, hospitals are often unaware of the fact that payment is generally not made under the limited inpatient Part B benefit for services provided on the non-covered days of a stay for which there was at least one covered day at the time of admission.  This is because Medicare is obligated to pay the entire DRG for that stay if there was at least one covered day at the time of admission.  It is not clear whether there would be payment under Part B for the screening and other preventive services furnished on non-covered days, since those services would not be included in the DRG payment.

Hospitals are encouraged to review their procedures for billing services under the limited inpatient Part B benefit.  Such services must be reported on a separate type of bill (012X) from that on which they generally bill their inpatient Part A covered services.

QUESTION: Has your hospital been billing for the screening and other preventive services provided during a covered inpatient Part A stay on a separate 012X claim? Click here to respond.

Entry Information

Filed Under: OPPS

Tags:

Judith Kares About the Author: Judith Kares is an instructor for HCPro's Medicare Boot Camp - Hospital Version. Judith has also been involved in the following:

  • Development of comprehensive compliance programs
  • Initial and follow-up risk assessments
  • Development and implementation of compliance training programs
  • Compliance audits and internal investigations
  • Research/advice regarding specific risk areas
  • Development of corrective action programs
Prior to beginning her current legal/consulting practice, Judith spent a number of years in private law practice, representing hospitals and other health care clients, and then as in-house legal counsel. In that capacity, she served first as Assistant General Counsel and Director of the Legal Department for Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Arizona (BCBSAZ) and then as Deputy General Counsel, Regulatory and Contract Compliance, with Blue Cross and Blue Shield of the National Capital Area (BCBSNCA) in Washington, D.C.

In both in-house positions, Judith had primary responsibility for contracting and regulatory compliance. The latter included oversight of federal and state health care programs. BCBSAZ was a fiscal intermediary, a Medicare risk and AHCCCS (Arizona's managed care alternative to traditional Medicaid) contractor, as well as a participating contractor under the national Blue Cross/Blue Shield Federal Employee Program.

Judith is also an adjunct faculty member at the University of Phoenix, where she teaches courses in business and health care law and ethics. She is an advocate for the use of alternatives to traditional dispute resolution, having participated in the volunteer mediation program in the Justice Courts of Maricopa County, Arizona. Judith is a frequent speaker at healthcare-related seminars. In addition to her membership in the State Bar of Arizona and the Tennessee Bar Association, Judith is a member of the American Health Lawyers Association, the Health Care Compliance Association, and the Arizona Association of Health Care Lawyers.

Judith earned her Juris Doctor degree (with high distinction) from The University of Iowa, College of Law and her B.A. (with highest distinction) from Purdue University.

RSSComments: 1  |  Post a Comment  |  Trackback URL

  1. This non-payment of surgical procedures is so unfair! Just because the physician writes a single word “admit” and we are unable to make the change to outpatient status while the patient is still here, we are not reimbursed for a medically necessary procedure. I can’t believe this is the intent of CMS? Why isn’t the Americal Hospital Association doing something about this?

RSSPost a Comment  |  Trackback URL