December 22, 2008 | Kimberly Hoy | Comments 0
Email This Post Print This Post

NP/PA supervision in provider-based departments

Happy holidays everyone! I thought I would write a bit about physician supervision. One of the clarifications that I have discussed with many people recently is related to nurse practitioners (NP) or physician assistants (PA). CMS clarified that NPs/PAs may not provide the physician supervision in provider-based departments. This fact was not a surprise to most, but the impact for NP/PA rendered services should be considered.

These extension providers often provide care in hospital-based clinics, such as urgent care centers or fast track facilities, without a physician being present in the department; in fact, they sometimes “cover” when the physician is unable to be present. However, the facility portion of this service is a hospital service subject to direct supervision under the hospital regulations.[1] Therefore, in accordance with the direct supervision guidelines discussed in the most recent OPPS final rule, a physician must be present in the department for the hospital facility service to be covered by Medicare.

Some confusion has arisen because these visits are generally appropriate under most state laws that allow NPs/PAs to practice without a physician on the premises. Additionally, the professional service by a NP/PA need not be under direct supervision for the service to be billable as a covered professional service to Medicare. The NP/PA would simply bill under his or her own NPI and be paid at a lower rate. Because the service is provided within the NP/PA’s scope of service (and is generally thought of as a professional service), many providers have not considered that the hospital direct supervision requirements apply to the facility portion—and that without a physician present, the hospital facility service is not covered.

I encourage providers to review the guidance on NPs/PAs in the OPPS final rule and evaluate locations where these extension providers might be providing services without a physician present some or all of the time.


[1] The regulations exempt rural health clinics and federally qualified health centers from the direct supervision requirements.

Entry Information

Filed Under: CoverageOPPS

Tags:

Kimberly Hoy About the Author:

Kimberly Anderwood Hoy is director of Medicare and compliance for HCPro, Inc.

As a hospital compliance officer, Kimberly regularly provided research and guidance on coding, billing, and reimbursement issues for a wide range of hospital services. She has a particular expertise in charge description master operation, development, and maintenance. She has experience conducting billing compliance audits and internal investigations. Kimberly also has had primary responsibility for HIPAA privacy regulation compliance, including risk assessment, program development, implementation of policies and procedures, and ongoing operations.

As In-House Legal Counsel, Kimberly had oversight of expense contracting and regulatory compliance, including federal and state laws and regulations. Kimberly regularly provided legal advice on such complex topics as consents, EMTALA, Stark, anti-kickback and anti-inducement laws, physician recruiting, and tax exemption regulations.

Kimberly has served as a speaker at compliance-related conferences in the areas of compliance program effectiveness and physician education. Kimberly is an active member of the American and California Bar Associations, the American Health Lawyers Association and the Health Care Compliance Association.

Kimberly earned her Juris Doctor degree from the University of Montana School of Law, where she received the Corpus Juris Secundum Award for Excellence in Contracts. She also holds a Bachelor of Arts degree in Philosophy from Yale University.

RSSPost a Comment  |  Trackback URL