All Entries Tagged With: "ICD-10 training"
My experience at an AHIMA trainer session Part 3
During this three-day training, we learned as much as possible about this new classification system. I received a letter in the mail right before leaving for the American Health Information Management Association (AHIMA) Academy for ICD-10 trainer session in Grapevine, TX, only to find out that the learning doesn’t end after the three days!
I still have to take the “final exam” between late October and late January 2010 to demonstrate that I understand and can apply this new system to become an “AHIMA certified ICD-10 trainer.”
I was surprised that there was not a specific credential or at least a designation, even if it was just an appendage onto one of my AHIMA certifications, to notate that I had endured this training. Even the American Academy for Professional Coders designates its professional medical coding curriculum (PMCC) instructors with an “I” at the end of their credential (i.e., CPC-I).
I’m not sure how to publicize that I did this training other than to add it as a tidbit of information onto my bio. It should be identified somehow right?
It was amazing to sit through such an intensive training session. I recently taught a class in Boston, and I had to admit to my students that I was reminded of how my Boot Camp attendees feel when we cover so much material in a five-day class. I had an increased sympathy for them, having endured it myself recently. It reinforced to me how important it is to have engaging, fun, and energetic instructors — especially in an intensive learning format.
This three-day session was definitely an information-overload experience, but I feel confident that I can share this information with the masses when the need arises.
Has your coding manager or coding staff members attended any kind of ICD-10 training sessions yet? Now that I’ve shared a bit of my experience, we would love to hear what yours was like. Please post your comment here.
My experience at an AHIMA trainer session
I recently completed the American Health Information Management Association (AHIMA) Academy for ICD-10 trainer session in Grapevine, TX. It was a whirlwind experience. The days were long, but it was fun to learn something new.
I am convinced now more than ever that ICD-10-CM is very much like ICD-9-CM. But ICD-10-PCS will take some getting used to.
For ICD-10-CM, we still follow the same steps to assign codes—they just don’t look like our beloved ICD-9-CM codes. I have memorized so many codes over the years (as I can imagine many of my fellow coders also have), so this will be one of the hardest adjustments to make. With ICD-10-CM, we will have to exercise our minds into learning and memorizing new codes. For example, all of us in the training session learned a new code the first day that I will never forget—I10 for hypertension!
There are definitely aspects about ICD-10-CM that I am excited about. We no longer need to concern ourselves with determining whether hypertension was benign or malignant or whether diabetes is uncontrolled or not stated as uncontrolled because ICD-10-CM codes are not differentiated in this manner.
For conditions such as septic shock, it is wonderful that we will have a combination code for sepsis with septic shock (R65.21). In ICD-9-CM, we generally have to report three codes (systemic infection, 995.92, and 785.52). With ICD-10-CM, we have to report only two codes: The underlying condition first and R65.21. Overall, we are still making progress in simplifying the system.
ICD-10-PCS is a whole different ball of wax! Stay tuned to hear more about this in a future blog. Have you attended one of AHIMA’s trainer sessions? What was your experience like? Share your comments here!
Some AHIMA training sessions already sold out
The American Health Information Management Association (AHIMA) is hosting three sessions of the “Academy for ICD-10-CM/PCS Trainers”:
- July 24 – 26, 2009 | Las Vegas, NV | Planet Hollywood Resort SOLD OUT
- September 9-11 | Chicago, IL | AHIMA National Office SOLD OUT (1st session); but AHIMA added a 2nd session
- October 8-10 | Grapevine, TX | In conjunction with the AHIMA Convention and Exhibit
I was already planning to attend the national AHIMA convention October 3-8th and thought it would be a great time to attend the “train the trainer” sessions following the convention. Why make two separate trips right? Well, I had no idea that getting a seat in one of these sessions would be such an ordeal. I was concerned about registering for the October session after seeing how the first two locations were already sold out and they were more than two months away!
So, I called the AHIMA to inquire about the number of seats they had in these sessions because they seemed to go like hotcakes. The very nice representative e-mailed me and explained that they were only allowing 50 people per session (at the time) and that registration would not be available until May 1.
I marked my calendar to make sure I registered on May 1, when the registration opened. I felt like I was a teenager waiting for the hottest concert tickets to go on sale at 8 a.m. (minus the sleeping outside in the cold – not that I have ever done that anyway!)
I logged on at 8:30 a.m. EST, and registration still wasn’t available. Of course, I now remembered that the AHIMA is in Chicago, which means they are on CT. I logged back in at 9:30 a.m. EST and was able to register. Whew! I got a seat! I was so excited.
I did notice that they have now increased the maximum number to 100 attendees.
I sure hope this training is as valuable as I expect. The price is $1,900! The AHIMA doesn’t mess around being that this education will bring in approximately $190,000 per session. I am glad it is a nonprofit organization.
I am not sure whether the reason it is such a hot commodity right now is based on the fact that attendees are being proactive to get their organization ready or whether it is because there is going to be a band wagon of people “putting out shingles” that they are AHIMA certified ICD-10-CM/PCS trainers. I know that I intend on using the knowledge to share with the thousands of students who have come to rely on HCPro for their training.
If you’re not ready to dive in, start by getting your feet wet
We’ve read the words of caution and heard the urgency of the message: Don’t put off planning for ICD-10. And while there is no one-size-fits-all plan for implementation, there is one tip that everyone should bear in mind: It’s too early for coder training in ICD-10. Think about how well people retain information over time. Can you remember all of the coding guidance in Coding Clinic from six months ago? Can you remember the top 10 tips you learned at your last in-service training? Now imagine trying to remember all the knowledge you might gain in a week’s training four years from this point.
So what should coders be doing right now? Look at the basic coding conventions and the most obvious differences involved with the new coding system. For example, start with small nuggets of information and build on that slowly. Do you know what an Excludes 1 or an Excludes 2 note indicates?
Excludes1: Denotes “not coded here,” meaning coders should never report the excluded code at the same time as the code above the excludes1 note (e.g., the congenital form versus an acquired form of the same condition).
Excludes2: Denotes “not included here,” meaning that the condition excluded is not part of the condition represented by the code even though a patient may have both conditions at the same time. When an excludes2 note appears under a code, coders can report both codes together, when appropriate.
That wasn’t so bad was it? So for the coding side of this transition, start now but start small.

