All Entries Tagged With: "code freeze"
Coders weigh in on potential freeze of coding systems
In a previous blog, I discussed how CMS was considering freezing updates to the ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 coding systems prior to the October 1, 2013 implementation. Many in the industry have said that freezing the codes would:
- Make it easier to develop educational materials for the implementation without worrying about updating them each year
- Help vendors develop products
In the ICD-10 final rule, CMS said that it would take this issue to the ICD-9 Coordination and Maintenance Committee meeting in September and seek input from various providers and vendors and others regarding the following points:
- Should there be a freeze?
- If so, should it be of both ICD-9 and ICD-10 or one or the other?
- When should the freeze begin? For example, should October 1, 2012 be the last time ICD-9-CM codes and ICD-10-CM and PCS codes are updated? Or should a freeze be established as early as 2011?
We polled JustCoding News subscribers in June, and we wanted share the results.
Should CMS freeze updates to ICD-9 codes, ICD-10 codes, or both prior to ICD-10 implementation? This is the breakdown of the 179 responses:
- ICD-9 codes: 22%
- ICD-10 codes: 5%
- Both ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes: 33%
- I don’t think CMS needs to freeze updates prior to ICD-10 implementation: 40%
If CMS decides to freeze updates to ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes, when should it implement this freeze? This is the breakdown of the 143 responses:
- October 1, 2011: 44%
- October 1, 2012: 56%
What do you think about a potential freeze of ICD-9 and ICD-10 code updates?
CMS seeks feedback from the industry on a potential code freeze
On May 19, CMS hosted a conference call during which it addressed the use of General Equivalence Mappings (GEMs). A transcript of the call is now available on the CMS Web site.
CMS representative Pat Brooks, RHIA, senior technical advisor for the hospital and ambulatory policy group highlighted an important agenda item that will be discussed at the September 16-17 ICD-9-CM Coordination and Maintenance meeting.
Many in the industry have expressed to CMS that they feel it is important for CMS and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to consider freezing updates to the ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 coding systems prior to the October 1, 2013 implementation. Many have said that freezing the codes would make it easier to develop educational materials for the implementation without worrying about updating them each year. Many people also said that they felt this kind of freeze would help vendors develop products.
In the ICD-10 final rule, CMS said that it would take this issue to the ICD-9 Coordination and Maintenance Committee and seek input from various providers and vendors and others on what they thought about this suggestion. CMS will pose the following questions at that September 16-17 meeting:
- Should there be a freeze?
- If so, should it be of both ICD-9 and ICD-10 or one or the other?
- When should the freeze begin? For example, should October 1, 2012 be the last time ICD-9-CM codes and ICD-10-CM and PCS codes are updated? Or should a freeze be established as early as 2011?
“These are the kinds of things we need to know from the industry,” Brooks said during the call. “We’ll be actively soliciting input from you to speak about whether there should be a freeze, and if so, when should the freeze be? Come to the meeting and discuss this.”
You can register for this meeting beginning August 14. Or write to CMS after the meeting, and provide your own input. Be sure to answer the following questions:
- How important would this freeze be to your organization?
- Should ICD-9-CM and/or ICD-10 be frozen prior to ICD-10 implementation?
- When should the freeze begin?
