Oh, that Jose Canseco. Such a kidder.
Turns out, his claim that his finger fell off during a poker game was a joke. He did actually shoot part of it off “cleaning” his gun and did indeed have it reattached. However, it’s still attached to his hand and not frozen for posterity (or future sale on eBay).
Why would Jose tell such a whopper? (NOTE: all of the suppositions in this post are just for fun and are not intended to be actual diagnoses of a specific individual. In other words, we’re pretending.)
Maybe he suffers from F60.81 (narcissistic personality disorder). Individuals with narcissistic personality disorder grow up feeling superior and needing to be admired. They have a longstanding pattern of grandiosity (in fantasy or behavior), need for admiration, and lack of empathy. Well, he was an adored pro athlete. He wrote a book about steroids in baseball. He tried to one-up the Philae lander’s touchdown on a comet.
Another possibility is histrionic personality disorder, which is characterized by a pattern of excessive attention-seeking emotions. People with histrionic personality disorder have a high need for attention, make loud and inappropriate appearances, exaggerate their behaviors and emotions, and crave stimulation. That would dovetail nicely with his possible F63.0 (compulsive gambler).
By his own admission, Canseco used anabolic steroids during his playing days, so maybe he is suffering from T38.7X1- (anabolic steroid poisoning). Or perhaps he’s suffering consequences of F55.3 (steroid abuse).
Perhaps Jose is really an F60.2 (pathological liar). Or maybe he has F07.81 (postconcussion syndrome) from the baseball that hit him in the head and bounced over the fence for a home run. The F07.81 could also be a result of his foray into boxing and mixed martial arts.
Most likely, though, he’s not suffering from any clinical condition. He just thought it would be funny.
In October, Jose was cleaning a gun and accidentally shot off part of his left middle finger. According to Jose’s girlfriend, the finger was hanging on by a thread because Jose blew away an artery and a chunk of bone.
If we were to code Jose’s mishap, we would need some additional information. We already know the laterality and the specific finger. We also know it’s a partial amputation and it’s pretty traumatic. With that information, we can head to category S68 (traumatic amputation of wrist, hand, and fingers). Note that if the physician does not specify whether the amputation is complete or partial, you default to complete.
The next piece of information we need is where on the finger the partial amputation occurred. We have two choices:
- S68.123-, partial traumatic metacarpophalangeal amputation of left middle finger
- S68.623-, partial traumatic transphalangeal amputation of left middle finger
We also need a seventh character to denote the encounter.
We can also add some external cause codes to explain what happened to Jose:
- W32.0XXA, accidental handgun discharge, initial encounter (this was operator error, not a mechanical failure)
- Y92.019, unspecified place in single-family (private) house as the place of occurrence of the external cause (We know from media reports that he was home, but we don’t know which room. Really, it doesn’t matter much for our purposes, but his insurance company may want to know.)
- Y99.8, other external cause status
We don’t know what specific treatment Jose had for his finger (I wasn’t interested enough to really dig in). So instead we’re going to look at how you would code a finger reattachment in ICD-10-PCS. For purposes of today’s post, we’re going to pretend Jose lost the whole finger (just make sure you don’t pretend or assume when you’re coding in the real world).
When we code for reattaching a body part, we’re going to use root operation Reattachment. That makes sense.
Our body system will be the upper extremities, which leads us to table 0XM.
ICD-10-PCS includes a body part character to each finger on each hand, so we know exactly which finger we’re dealing with. We’ll look for left middle finger, which gives us fourth character R. The rest of the code is a cakewalk because we only have one choice for each of the final three characters:
- Open approach (0)
- No device (Z)
- No qualifier (Z)
That makes our reattachment of the left middle finger code 0XMR0ZZ.
Sadly, Jose’s finger decided it didn’t want to stick around. Late last week, Jose noticed the finger was starting to smell bad. Um, Jose, that’s probably gangrene. You should go to a doctor.
Instead, he went to a poker tournament in Las Vegas and claims the finger fell off. That probably falls under T87.2 (complications of other reattached body part). Note this is a not elsewhere classified code. We know the body part, we just don’t have a more specific code.
We also don’t have an external cause code for playing cards. Maybe they’ll add that in the first round of ICD-10-CM updates.
As healthcare professionals, we’re all familiar to some degree with HIPAA. You know, the law that makes it illegal to release protected health information, among other things. Hospital employees have been fired for snooping into celebrities’ records. So it’s always interesting to see what health information celebs voluntarily share.
Angelina Jolie went very public with her decision to undergo a double mastectomy because of a higher likelihood she would get breast cancer.
Actor Hugh Jackman has been equally candid about his repeated bouts of skin cancer. How would we code Jackman’s cancer? First we need to know what kind of cancer he’s had. Luckily for us, he’s told the world it’s basal cell carcinoma (BCC).
BCC is the most common type of skin cancer, so in the Table of Neoplasms, we would look under skin. Not surprisingly, we see we need to know where on the skin his cancer was. Through the magic power of the Internet, we know it was on his nose—all three times.
Scanning down the many rows of skin cancer, we finally find nose, which gives us C44.301 (unspecified malignant neoplasm of skin of nose). Well, that’s not right. We know what kind of cancer it is.
Let’s go back to the table and look up nose. Okay, we have lots of choices under nose, including skin. And under skin, we find a specific entry for BCC—C44.311 (basal cell carcinoma of skin of nose).
The Table of Neoplasms has six columns to describe the nature of the neoplasm (neoplasm does not equal cancer). You probably noticed, though, that BCC only has one possible code and it’s under Malignancy, primary. That’s because a carcinoma by definition is cancer. Neoplasm is not necessarily cancer, carcinoma is definitely cancer.
Fortunately for Jackman, BCCs are easily treated and are rarely, if ever, fatal.
Actor Michael J. Fox has been suffering from Parkinson’s disease since 1991. ICD-10-CM includes multiple codes for Parkinsonism, but only one for Parkinson’s disease—G20. Numerous conditions fall under G20, including:
- Idiopathic Parkinsonism or Parkinson’s disease
- Paralysis agitans
- Parkinsonism or Parkinson’s disease NOS
- Primary Parkinsonism or Parkinson’s disease
If the physician documents any of those terms, you’ll report G20.
Actor and comedian Robin Williams also suffered from Parkinson’s disease, as well as depression throughout his lifetime. He also reportedly suffered from delusions and/or hallucinations caused by Lewy bodies dementia.
If we look up dementia in the ICD-10-CM Alphabetic Index, we find a large number of choices depending on the type of dementia. Lewy bodies show up twice in the list, first under the subterm “with,” then as a standalone entry, “Lewy bodies.” Both entries lead you to the same code, G31.83 (dementia with Lewy bodies).
You’ll also notice codes F02.80 (dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere without behavioral disturbance) and F02.81 (dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere with behavioral disturbance) appear in brackets after G31.83. The specific code depends on whether the patient is exhibiting behavioral disturbances, including:
- Aggressive behavior
- Combative behavior
- Violent behavior
Wandering has its own code—Z91.83.
Codes that appear in brackets in the Alphabetic Index are manifestation codes.
Certain conditions have both an underlying cause and multiple body system manifestations due to that cause. In most cases, the manifestation codes will have in the code title, “in diseases classified elsewhere.” Codes with this title are a component of the etiology/manifestation convention.
“In diseases classified elsewhere” codes cannot be the first-listed or principal diagnosis. You can only report them with the code for the underlying condition and you always report it after the underlying condition.
Note that you would not code the delusions and/or hallucinations because they are an integral part of the dementia.
Welcome to OR 13 at the Stitch ‘Em Up Hospital, where Dr. Hack N. Slash is preparing for today’s procedure. And what is today’s procedure? Dr. Slash is performing a cut down and suturing of a pseudoaneurysm.
OK, what’s that? Well, a pseudoaneurysm is a hematoma adjacent to a hole or other disruption of the arterial wall. If you know your Greek, you know that “pseudo” means false. An aneurysm is a balloon-like bulge in an artery. So instead of the pseudoaneurysm being a bulge in an artery, the blood is actually collecting outside the arterial wall. Not a good thing.
A pseudoaneurysm is caused by blood slowly leaking into the surrounding tissue. It can happen pretty much anywhere you have an artery (which is pretty much everywhere in your body).
Pseudoaneurysms can also occur in the heart after damage from a heart attack causes blood to leak and pool outside the injured heart muscle.
The first thing we need to know is where the pseudoaneurysm is. That will give us our second character for our ICD-10-PCS code. The first character will be a 0 (zero, not a capital letter o) for the Medical and Surgical section. This is the biggest section of the ICD-10-PCS Manual and the one most non-OB coders will use the most.
Dr. Slash documents that the patient’s left leg is prepped and draped in a sterile fashion and he makes an incision to expose the femoral artery. That gives us lower artery as the body system (second character 4) and left femoral artery for the body part (fourth character L).
But we still need a third character, which is our root operation. What is the intent of this procedure? Well, Dr. Slash is attempting to remove blood from the patient’s leg, so maybe it’s Drainage (third character 9).
ICD-10-PCS defines Drainage as “taking or letting out fluids and/or gases from a body part.” Is Dr. Slash’s intention really just to remove the blood? Let’s check the OP report.
Under objective, Dr. Slash states he is suturing the artery to return it to its normal function. OK, so not Drainage. Dr. Slash’s objective isn’t to remove the blood flow. It’s to suture the hole in the artery to stop the leak. Which other root operation fits?
Turns out, it’s the “not elsewhere classified” (NEC) root operation Repair (restoring, to the extent possible, a body part to its normal anatomic structure and function).
We only use Repair (third character Q) when the method to accomplish the restoration is not one of the other root operations. That’s what makes it the NEC of root operations. If you’ve worked in the outpatient world at all, you are familiar with modifier -59 (distinct procedural service). You only append that modifier if no other modifier is more appropriate. Repair is the same way. You only report Repair when none of the other root operations describe the procedure.
Now we can head to the table because we have our first three characters: 04Q.
We already know the body part, so our code so far is 04QL. Notice that we have a different body part for the right femoral artery, along with:
- Abdominal aorta
- Celiac artery
- Gastric artery
- Hepatic artery
- Splenic artery
- Superior mesenteric artery
- Colic artery (right, left, and middle)
- Renal artery (right and left)
- Inferior mesenteric artery
- Common iliac artery (right and left)
- Internal iliac artery( right and left)
- External iliac artery (right and left)
- Popliteal artery (right and left)
- Anterior tibial artery (right and left)
- Posterior tibial artery (right and left)
- Peroneal artery (right and left)
- Foot artery (right and left)
That is not by any means an exhaustive list of lower arteries, so we also have a body part character for “lower artery.”
You need to carefully read the body of the OP report to make sure the physician is actually performing the procedure he or she listed in the objective section. Sometimes surgeons need to change the procedure or sometimes they need to add a procedure.
The artery list is very specific, so if your surgeons are not this precise in their documentation, start working with them now on the added specificity. Chances are surgeons are documenting this somewhere in the OP report. You just may need to dig for it. (And make sure you scour the record before you fire off that query for location. No need to unnecessarily anger the surgeon.)
Back to our code. We have three choices for the approach:
- 0, open
- 3, percutaneous
- 4, percutaneous endoscopic
Dr. Slash documented making an incision down to the artery to visualize the hole, so our approach is open (cutting through the skin or mucous membrane and any other body layers necessary to expose the site of the procedure).
Our final two characters are a snap because we only have one option for each:
- Z, no device
- Z, no qualifier
Our final code is 04QL0ZZ (repair left femoral artery, open approach).
All that’s left now is to sew up the patient and send him off to recovery.
Ghosties and ghoulies and long-legged beasties are parading through the Fix ‘Em Up Clinic. It must be Halloween and the staff Halloween party.
Even the best planned Halloween party can go astray (especially with imps running around the building). Fortunately we know how to code the mishaps.
Our first bump in the night came during the bobbing for apples activity. Shannon and Wendy both went for the same apple and instead of a bite of juicy fruit, they cracked their heads together. Such a wailing you have never heard.
To code their contusions, we need to know where they occurred. ICD-10-CM includes specific codes for contusions of the:
- Forehead (S00.83-)
- Ear (S00.43-)
- Eyebrow (S00.1-)
- Cheek (S00.83-)
- Nose (nasal, S00.33-)
- Jaw (S00.83-)
- Scalp (S00.03)
You’ll notice code S00.83- shows up several times. It’s a not elsewhere classified code, specifically contusion of other part of the head. We know where the contusion occurred, we just don’t have a code for that specific body part.
Don’t confuse that with the not elsewhere classified code, S00.93- (contusion of unspecified part of head). You will report S00.93- when the physician doesn’t tell you where the contusion occurred other than the patient’s head.
Wendy and Shannon smacked foreheads, so we would report S00.83XA (contusion of other part of head, initial encounter) for both.
Make sure a ghost doesn’t make off with your placeholder X. S00.83A is not a valid ICD-10-CM code.
Speaking of ghosts making off with things, John decided to decamp with an entire pizza that was intended for the party. He consumed all of said pizza, making the evidence disappear—until he barfed it back up. (Yuck. I’m glad I don’t have to clean that up.)
ICD-10-CM contains multiple codes for vomiting, depending on the type and cause, including:
Fortunately, John’s vomiting is solely due to excess pizza consumption. He also claims to be nauseous (no wonder), so we will report R11.2 (nausea with vomiting, unspecified).
We ended the Halloween party with a recitation of the classic Edgar Allen Poe poem, The Raven. Our performer turned out to be a little too terrifying for some of the smaller children. In fact, several suffered from:
- Generalize anxiety (F41.1)
- Excessive crying (R45.83)
- Fear of birds (F40.218)
Well, that was a good party. Now it’s time to scare the trick-or-treaters.
Once upon a midnight dreary, as I labored on a query
As I nodded, nearly napping (that darn G47.411 again)
Suddenly there came a tapping
As of someone gently rapping, rapping at my cubicle wall
Tis just my manager, I muttered, coming for the query
Only this and nothing more
The silken, sad, muffled rustling of each chart that I sat shuffling
Thrilled me—filled me with fantastic terrors never felt before (oh wait, that’s just F41.1);
So that now, to still the beating of my heart, I stood repeating,
“Tis just my manager coming for the query
Just my manager looking for the query”
This it is and nothing more.
Presently my soul grew stronger; hesitating then no longer,
“Jill,” said I, “or Shannon, truly your forgiveness I implore;
But you know my lack of hearing (H90.0) caused by this incessant ringing (H93.13)
Left me thinking there was no one tapping at my cubicle door,
I scarce was sure I heard you”—here I opened wide the door—
Darkness there and nothing more.
Deep into that darkness peering, long I stood there wondering, fearing (more F41.1),
Doubting, dreaming dreams no mortal ever dared to dream before;
But the silence was unbroken (or am I just suffering H91.23?), and the stillness gave no token,
Until I heard this one word spoken—ICD-10
This I whispered and an echo murmured back—ICD-10
Merely this and nothing more.
Back into the chamber turning, all my soul within me burning (maybe it’s really R12 and not my soul),
Soon again I heard a tapping somewhat louder than before.
Open here I flung the door, to see a Raven of the days of yore;
Perched above the neighboring cubicle door
Perched contently above my next-door neighbor’s cubicle door
Then he spoke—ICD-10—and nothing more.
Wonderful, I muttered, now I’m seeing birds, I shuttered
I’ve started hallucinating a creepy bird of yore (R44.1, too bad it doesn’t specify what I’m seeing)
I really want to write this query
So I can code this record, I am weary (R53.83)
Weary of worrying when ICD-10 will be implemented
Quoth the raven, 2015
This he said and nothing more.
Listen bird, I said with feeling, please don’t let me be dreaming
Please tell me that ICD-10 is really coming soon
Currently our codes are lacking
We can’t even tell what’s catching
We don’t know what diseases we’re not tracking
Quoth the raven, 2015
This he said and nothing more.
“Be that word our sign of parting, bird my friend!” I grinned, upstarting—
“Get thee back into the tempest and spread the word to every coder!
Leave one black plume as a token of that joy thy beak hath spoken!
Leave my hopefulness unbroken!—quit the perch above my neighbors door!
Take thy beak from out my heart (S26.19, W61.99XA), and take thy form from off my neighbor’s door!”
Quoth the raven, 2015
This he said and nothing more.
Ewww, I don’t think so. Your feet stink. What could be causing that foul odor to emanate from your feet?
Sweat by itself is odorless, but when it comes into contact with bacteria it begins to smell bad. Usually, the bacteria are harmless, but some, such as necrotizing fasciitis, can eat through the skin.
Maybe you have necrotizing fasciitis. How would we code that in ICD-10-CM?
If you look up fasciitis, necrotizing, in the ICD-10-CM Alphabetic Index, you are directed to code M72.6. Pretty easy at first glance. We only have one code, so we don’t need to know what area the necrotizing fasciitis affected.
We do, however, need to use additional code (B95.-, B96.-) to identify causative organism. Is the necrotizing fasciitis caused by a form of Streptococcus, Staphylococcus, and Enterococcus or by some other bacterial agent, such as E. coli or Klebsiella pneumonia?
Categories B95 and B96 do include unspecified options in case the physician doesn’t know whether the patient’s necrotizing fasciitis is caused by group A strep or group B strep. And you can use those unspecified codes. They are completely legitimate. The ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting even tell us that performing a medically unnecessary lab test just to arrive at a more specific code is inappropriate. (It’s guideline I.B.18 in case you’re interested.)
Perhaps you have gangrene instead of necrotizing fasciitis. Gangrene reeks. The ICD-10-CM codes for gangrene are more specific than those for necrotizing fasciitis. We need to know where the gangrene is before we can code it.
ICD-10-CM does not include a separate listing for gangrene of the feet. It falls under gangrene of the upper and lower extremities, which leads to I96 (gangrene, not elsewhere classified).
Before you report I96, make sure you review the Excludes1 note. Excludes1 in ICD-10-CM means the two conditions are mutually exclusive. A patient can’t have both at the same time. Under I96, the Excludes1 note specifies:
- Gangrene in atherosclerosis of native arteries of the extremities (I70.26)
- Gangrene in diabetes mellitus (E08-E13)
- Gangrene in hernia (K40.1, K40.4, K41.1, K41.4, K42.1, K43.1-, K44.1, K45.1, K46.1)
- Gangrene in other peripheral vascular diseases (I73.-)
- Gangrene of certain specified sites – see Alphabetical Index
- Gas gangrene (A48.0)
- Pyoderma gangrenosum (L88)
If a patient suffers from atherosclerosis of native arteries of the extremities or diabetes mellitus, you may need to query the provider to make sure the two conditions aren’t causally related. In ICD-9-CM, we can assume a relationship between diabetes mellitus and gangrene if the physician does not document any other cause of the gangrene.
Coders cannot report the combination codes for diabetes and a complication, such as gangrene, unless the physician specifically documents the relationship between the diabetes and the condition.
Maybe the cause of your foul feet is something a little less life-threatening. You could just suffer from hyperhidrosis (aka sweaty feet).
The default code in ICD-10-CM is R61 (generalized hyperhidrosis). However, again we find some important Exludes1 notes:
- Focal (primary) (secondary) hyperhidrosis (L74.5-)
- Frey’s syndrome (L74.52)
- Localized (primary) (secondary) hyperhidrosis (L74.5-)
These conditions are all more specific than the generalized hyperhidrosis.
When excessive sweating affects the hands, feet, and armpits, it is called primary or focal (local) hyperhidrosis. Since we know the hyperhidrosis is of the feet, we would look to L74.5-.
The only code in this subcategory that applies is L74.513 (primary focal hyperhidrosis, soles). Again, the physician will need to documents that specific information in the medical record or you may need to query.
In the meantime, might I suggest some extra strength Odor Eaters?
The AHA publishes Coding Clinic on a quarterly basis and addresses questions submitted to Coding Clinic by stakeholders in the healthcare industry.
Coders, as well as payers, use Coding Clinic advice to determine accurate code assignment.
However, Coding Clinic does not provide clinical criteria for establishing diagnoses and has no authority to provide clinical definitions, nor does it replace physician documentation regarding the clinical significance of a patient’s condition.
Coding Clinic does provide guidance on what codes can be reported based on already-documented diagnoses.
Coding Clinic information may still be useful to understand clinical clues regarding signs or symptoms that may be integral (or not) to a condition.
The Coding Clinic editorial staff is not updating past guidance for ICD-9-CM to ICD-10, just like CMS is not transitioning all National Coverage Determinations from ICD-9-CM to ICD-10.
Coding Clinic staff members are only answering ICD-10 questions going forward, but the editors can only answer question that you ask. So if you are practicing (or learning) ICD-10 and something seems wrong or you’re confused, submit a question to Coding Clinic.
They don’t guarantee they will answer your question, but odds are, someone else has the same question. The more questions we raise before implementation, the more information we will have when we start assigning ICD-10 codes for real. Remember, though, that the Coding Clinic editors are new to ICD-10 as well. Some of the answers they publish now may need to be updated as more information becomes available and coders actually use the new codes.
Poor Mr. Frank N. Stein. He just coughed up a lung. Literally.
First, what diagnosis code would we report for Frank? Well, he’s here for a transplant, so lung transplant would be his principal diagnosis, right? No.
The lung transplant is being used to treat a condition, such as COPD or cystic fibrosis. Remember that the principal diagnosis is the condition established after study to be chiefly responsible for occasioning the admission of the patient to the hospital for care. Frank wound up in the hospital because he has some disease or condition of the lung that resulted in him coughing one up.
He could have bronchitis, pneumonia, COPD, or perhaps necrotic lung tissue. You’ll need to read the physician’s documentation to find out the underlying condition that caused Frank’s admission. You’ll also need to make sure the diagnosis supports the medical necessity of the lung transplant.
Let’s take Frank to the operating room and see what Dr. Shelley is going to do to fix this lung problem. Dr. Shelley documents that she implanted a new left lung using a donated lung from a cadaver.
Our first character will be 0 (zero) for the Medical and Surgical section. Our second character denotes the body system—in Frank’s case the respiratory system. Our second character is B.
The third character is the root operation. What is the objective of the procedure? Dr. Shelley documents “implantation,” which is not an ICD-10-PCS root operation. However, we do have root operation Transplantation.
The official ICD-10-PCS definition is “putting in or on all or a portion of a living body part taken from another individual or animal to physically take the place and/or function of all or a portion of a similar body part.” That sounds like the procedure Dr. Shelley is performing, so we’ll going with Transplantation (third character Y) as our root operation.
Remember, it’s up to us to determine the root operation. We need to apply the root operation definitions to find the one that matches the intent of the procedure. Just because a physician calls a procedure an Insertion doesn’t mean that’s the root operation we’re going to use.
We have enough information to head to an ICD-10-PCS table: 0BY.
The table gives us nine choices for a specific body part. Wait, we only have two lungs (two codes) and possibly a bilateral option. That’s three choices tops. How did we end up with nine?
Think back to your anatomy and physiology. The lungs are made up of lobes—two on the left and three on the right. Each lobe of each lung has its own body part value in ICD-10-PCS. So our body part choices are:
- C, upper lung lobe, right
- D, middle lung lobe, right
- F, lower lung lobe, right
- G, upper lung lobe, left
- H, lung lingula
- J, lower lung lobe, left
- K, lung, right
- L, lung, left
- M, lungs, bilateral
We know Dr. Shelley is transplanting the entire left lung, so our fourth character will be L.
Our next two characters are pretty easy because we only have one choice for each. The approach is always open and no device is ever used. Quick aside, device has a very specific meaning in ICD-10-PCS. You only code a device when it remains in the patient after the procedure is completed. So stents are devices, but sutures and temporary wound drains are not.
That brings us to the seventh character: the qualifier. For transplants, the qualifier denotes the type of tissue used in the transplant. For lung transplants, the tissue can be:
- 0, allogeneic (non-identical donor of the same species)
- 1, syngeneic (an identical member of the same species, i.e., an identical twin)
- 2, zooplastic (from a different species)
Dr. Shelley documented that the donor organ came from a cadaver and did not indicate that the donor was Frank’s identical twin brother, so our seventh character is 0.
Our final code is 0BYL0Z0 (Transplantation of left lung, allogeneic, open approach).
That code contains quite a bit of information: the organ, the laterality, the procedure, how it was done, where the donor organ came from.
In ICD-9-CM Volume 3, we need two codes to get all of that information: one code for the lung transplant (33.51, unilateral lung transplant) and one for the donor source (00.93, transplant from cadaver).
One thing we don’t have in ICD-9-CM is the laterality. We don’t know which lung was involved. Why would that matter? Well, think about Frank’s future medical care. Perhaps he develops lung cancer. You’ll be able to tell whether it’s the transplanted lung or his own lung involved.
Maybe Frank will need another lung transplant down the road (he’s a pretty unlucky guy). The physician will be able to tell whether he or she is replacing an original lung or a lung Frank picked up. That could provide information about the progression of the diseased that caused Frank’s need for a new lung in the first place. It could also provide information about the lifespan not just of the transplant recipient, but of the transplanted tissue itself.
And all of that could (and hopefully will) lead to better treatment.
If I hear one more person poke fun at ICD-10-CM code V97.33XD (sucked into a jet engine, subsequent encounter), I am going to develop a very strong case of R45.850. (That’s homicidal ideation in case you don’t have your code book handy.)
First of all, most of the people making fun of this code don’t actually understand what the code is conveying. See the New York Times, an Alabama physicians group, Healthcare Dive, The Boston Globe, and on and on and on.
The subsequent encounter part is not saying the person was sucked into a jet engine twice (what are the odds of that?). It’s telling us that the person is being seen for a subsequent encounter for injuries suffered when he or she was sucked into the jet engine. (And you can indeed survive being sucked into a jet engine as long as you are not on Lost.)
The seventh character is one of the main new concepts in ICD-10-CM. Maybe we need to do a better job of explaining what it means.
In most cases the seventh character indicates the episode of care. If the patient is receiving active treatment, you use seventh character A in most cases.
If the patient is being seen for routine follow up, the seventh character becomes D, again in most cases.
When the patient develops a complication or a condition that arises as a direct result of a condition, that’s a sequela reported with seventh character S (always).
Fracture codes have some additional seventh characters for nonunions, malunions, delayed healing, and open fractures. Most injury codes only give you three choices: A, D, and S.
Do the physicians at your organization know what the seventh character actually means? If not, here’s a perfect example you can use to explain it. V97.33XD doesn’t mean sucked into a jet engine twice. It means the patient is actually recovering from injuries sustained by his or her sole encounter with a jet engine.
The second reason this example drives me up a wall is because V97.33XD is an external cause code. It will never, ever, ever be the principal diagnosis. And you will almost never hold a claim for an external cause code. The only time you would is if a specific payer requires them. The ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting even state that there is no national requirement for reporting external cause codes. If you don’t report them now, you won’t report them in ICD-10-CM.
So why are we spending time talking about whether the patient was bitten by a chicken or a duck? It’s not going to change your payment. It’s probably not going to affect patient care. Although, if you are bitten by a wild animal, the physician may be more likely to worry that you’ll contract rabies.
Unfortunately too many physicians (and Congress members) rely on the mainstream uninformed media for information about ICD-10. We need to focus the discussion on what actually matters, not on what makes the best punchline.
For example, ICD-9-CM has no code for Ebola. You may have heard of Ebola and, depending on where you are in the U.S., you may indeed be coding for Ebola. Outside of the running tally in the mainstream media, how can you tell how many people in the U.S. have Ebola? Right now, you can’t. In ICD-10-CM you will be able to track that number.
If a patient breaks his leg, which leg is involved? In ICD-9-CM, we have no idea. In ICD-10-CM, we will not only know which leg is broken, but we’ll also be able to follow that patient’s progress with the seventh character. We’ll be able to see how many times the patient came back for active treatment, how often he was in for routine follow up, and whether he had any late effects from the break. The main code stays the same. Only the seventh character changes.
We have less than a year until ICD-10 implementation. We need to take the initiative to get the right information out about the benefits of ICD-10. Don’t be shy. Share the real story.