Physician queries in 2013
I am back to my ICD-10 blog following a long illness. It is great to be back!
Why is it that a date ending in 2013 seems so much closer to October 2014? Others must feel this way
because there seems to be a really flurry of activity at the ICD-10 websites I visit regularly since the new year. Hopefully, this new year is spurring us to keep moving forward with the ICD-10 implementation we have started.
The new year is a good time to take stock of where you are and to think about what needs to happen in 2013. For the next three weeks I will focus on physician queries for 2013. But first of all, review these best practices for physician queries.
Queries should be:
- Clearly and concisely written, contain precise language, present the facts and why clarification is needed, present the scenario
- Individualized to each patient and contain clinical evidence specific to the case
- Non-leading
- Used to clarify the intent of the physician
- Include the option that no additional documentation or clarification can be provided
- Addressed to a specific provider and close with the query author’s name and phone number
- Maintained in the medical record and be used as supporting documentation for coding
- Sent using only approved templates
On the other hand, queries should not:
- Result in a yes/no answer
- Be used as a substitute for appropriate physician documentation in the record
- Indicate to the provider an increase/decrease in payment
- Introduce information not otherwise contained in the medical record
Facilities should have a clear written policy or procedure to address the entire query process. The policy should:
- Explain when it is appropriate to query a physician
- How the query should be conducted
- Address where and how long the query will be kept
Make sure staff members are trained so they are familiar with acceptable query procedure.
Audit completed queries. Queries should be properly completed and appropriately dated and authenticated or they are noncompliant.
Organizations must also develop processes to:
- Notify the provider when a query is placed (email, note, fax)
- Following up on open queries
Next week I will blog about the ICD-10 documentation opportunities that we can begin implementing in 2013.






Marty Martin | Jan 28, 2013 | Reply
I am not a coder nor CDI professional. However, I am a healthcare software/technology educator with over 15 years of experience leading large training initiatives in large healthcare systems. Clearly, early CDI engagement with providers is a key component of a comprehensive ICD-10 training program. The challenge I have is how to develop metrics that measure CDI effectiveness with ICD-10 adaptation of providers, measure and report on progress and improvement in overall provider documentation, and measure and report on the overall ICD-10 readiness of the provider population. Any thoughts would be appreciated.
Melissa J. Varnavas | Jan 30, 2013 | Reply
Assessment of CDI effectiveness for ICD-10 would follow metrics similar to those applied to ICD-9. Looking for physician response rates, agreement rates… conducting CDI peer audits and reviewing queries for missed opportunities associated with I-10. You’d want to get coders involved too.
For some other ideas you could review the CDI Roadmap materials. http://www.hcpro.com/acdis/cdi_roadmap.cfm