Promoting efficient use of resources and appropriate hospitalization length of stay to physicians, a different approach
Physicians sometimes acquiesce to family wishes and desires and admit a patient for “social” reasons. On the other hand, a physician may keep a patient in the hospital an extra day because the patient expresses a desire to stay just “one more day.” These unnecessary, avoidable hospital days have a material effect on potential revenue loss for the hospital through denied days or denied hospital stays by third party payers.
A major challenge in motivating physicians to move the patient along the continuum is the disconnect between prudent hospital fiscal management and the practice patterns of physicians. The physician generally receives payment for his evaluation and management services regardless of whether the hospital is paid or denied for the patient care.
However, change is on the horizon. Medicare is currently considering provisions that will promote efficiency in the practice of medicine. Medicare and other third party payers are also committed to transitioning from physician payment based strictly on volume to payment based upon the relationship between quality, costs, and outcome. The efficiency and effectiveness of a physician’s practice of medicine will determine the physician’s financial welfare and business success.
Evidence of this impending change in reimbursement can be found in the General Accountability Office’s (GAO) report entitled “Per Capita Method Can Be Used to Profile Physicians and Provide Feedback on Resource Use.” This report is a must read. In essence the report concluded that it is feasible to use Medicare claims data to profile physicians on resource use, taking into account patient acuity through risk adjustment methodologies.
The report examined the following:
- The extent to which physicians in selected specialties show stable practice patterns and how beneficiary utilization of services varies by physician resource use level
- The factors to consider in developing feedback reports on physicians’ performance, including per capita resource use
- The extent to which feedback reports may influence physician behavior
The GAO focused on four medical specialties (cardiology, diagnostic radiology, internal medicine, and orthopedic surgery) and chose four metropolitan areas (Miami, Phoenix, Pittsburgh, and Sacramento).
The message is out!
Now is the time for case managers to become familiar with these eventual changes to the healthcare reimbursement model from a physician and a hospital perspective. This reimbursement model transition will not only drive out waste in the practice of medicine. It will also drive and promote a collaborative approach to healthcare delivery by using financial incentives.
Case managers should educate physicians on the need to collaborate with case management to move the patient along the continuum efficiently because physicians will receive reduced reimbursement for excessive resources.
Let the education begin.




Stefani Daniels | Nov 14, 2009 | Reply
For years we’ve been urging hospital executives to forego the persistent badgering to doctors, utilization reviewers and case managers about LOS which is a product of physician practice decisions and delivery of care process inefficiencies. As recently as July 15, 2008, in an article published in HealthLeadersMedia
http://www.healthleadersmedia.com/content/215087/topic/WS_HLM2_FIN/The-Myth-of-Length-of-Stay.html
we argued that using severity adjusted physician practice profiles and potential avoidable day data is more relevant to drive improvement in LOS, costs, revenue, and quality outcomes. Focus on these two relevant indicators of effectiveness and LOS will come tumbling down, iatrogenic risk of hospitalization will reduce, and economic stability can be achieved. Also check out our text book The Leader’s Guide to Hospital Case Mangement for further insight on this no-brainer strategy.
louise della bella | Nov 19, 2009 | Reply
How can I subscribe to the Case Mgmt Blog ?
please advise
thank you
louise
Jenifer O. Felinczak | Feb 1, 2010 | Reply
In your organizational structure to whom does case management report? Customarily casemanagement is organized under Quality or Nursing, is there any precedence for case management to report to Director of Revenue in the business office? Would there be a justifiable reason for this? Seems contrary to what case management’s role should be focused on.